Subscribe to this blog's feed

Categories

Archives

About

Blog powered by Typepad

Google

  • Google
    Google

    WWW
    insuranceclaimsbadfaith.typepad.com

Disclaimer

  • REMINDER: THE CONTENTS OF THIS BLOG DO NOT MAKE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP. ALWAYS CONSULT THE CASES AND LAWS OF EACH PARTICULAR JURISDICTION AND AN ATTORNEY IN AND FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR JURISDICTION AND ITS LAWS, WHENEVER YOU TRY TO ADDRESS OR RESOLVE ANY LEGAL QUESTION.
    The information provided on this site is informational, only. We cannot represent, guarantee or warrant that the information contained in this site is appropriate for the usage of any particular reader. We are independent of cross links and do not warrant their accuracy or applicability. We are located in Florida and comply with all ethical rules of the Florida Bar. Some States may require the wording "This is an advertisement" or other words or information of this nature. Reading email or Comments, or replying to email or Comments, or accepting telephone calls or returning telephone calls shall not be considered legal advice. We require that all agreements for professional services be in writing and signed by Mr. Wall, the Firm and the client, whether for Legal Services, Consulting Services, or Expert Witness.

« THE VALUE GOLDMAN PUTS ON ITS LATEST MORTGAGE PRACTICES SETTLEMENT. | Main | FLINT WATER POISONING:  MONEY, SICK PEOPLE, SICK NYT REPORTING. »

January 26, 2016

FLINT WATER POISONING IS NOT "HE SAID, SHE SAID" STORY.

On Sunday, January 24, 2016 the New York Times ran a front-page story about the poisoning of Flint, Michigan's water supply.  This prominently featured report was a failure and missed crucial pieces of the story, although it was written by three reporters who have earned respect in their past reporting.

As reported on Insurance Claims and Issues Blog, the residents of Flint filed a class action lawsuit in November, 2015 on account of the water poisoning.  I learned of this complaint from Wikipedia.  It was not mentioned a single time in the very long New York Times report.  Here again is the complaint: Download Mays v Snyder and Earley et al Class Action Complaint Doc. No. 1 Filed Nov. 13 2015 (E.D. Mich. No. 5.15.cv.14002)..

Please Read The Disclaimer.  ©2016 by Dennis J. Wall, Co-Author of "Catastrophe Claims / Insurance Coverage for Natural and Man-Made Disasters" (Thomson Reuters November, 2015).  All Rights Reserved.

Related articles
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT OF FLINT RESIDENTS OVER WATER POISONING BOONDOGGLE.
STATE PUBLIC OFFICIALS PAY TAXPAYER MONEY AFTER POLITICALLY CORRECT "SAVINGS."

Posted by on January 26, 2016 at 07:47 AM in Catastrophe Claims, Current Affairs |

Tags: class action, complaint, Flint, water poisoning

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.