Subscribe to this blog's feed

Categories

Archives

About

Blog powered by Typepad

Google

  • Google
    Google

    WWW
    insuranceclaimsbadfaith.typepad.com

Disclaimer

  • REMINDER: THE CONTENTS OF THIS BLOG DO NOT MAKE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP. ALWAYS CONSULT THE CASES AND LAWS OF EACH PARTICULAR JURISDICTION AND AN ATTORNEY IN AND FAMILIAR WITH THE PARTICULAR JURISDICTION AND ITS LAWS, WHENEVER YOU TRY TO ADDRESS OR RESOLVE ANY LEGAL QUESTION.
    The information provided on this site is informational, only. We cannot represent, guarantee or warrant that the information contained in this site is appropriate for the usage of any particular reader. We are independent of cross links and do not warrant their accuracy or applicability. We are located in Florida and comply with all ethical rules of the Florida Bar. Some States may require the wording "This is an advertisement" or other words or information of this nature. Reading email or Comments, or replying to email or Comments, or accepting telephone calls or returning telephone calls shall not be considered legal advice. We require that all agreements for professional services be in writing and signed by Mr. Wall, the Firm and the client, whether for Legal Services, Consulting Services, or Expert Witness.

« DUTY TO DEFEND AN ARBITRATION? | Main | ANOTHER TAKE: NO DUTY TO DEFEND ASSAULT AND BATTERY. »

June 24, 2020

DECLARING A THING "CONFIDENTIAL" IS NOT ENOUGH.

It is getting a little harder to get judges to sign Stipulated Protective Orders in some courts. "Designation as 'Confidential' is not sufficient, as that is merely the parties' initial designation of confidentiality to establish coverage under the stipulated protective order." Ortiz v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 18-cv-07727-HSG, 2020 WL 2793615, at *9 (N.D. Cal. May 29, 2020).

Please read the disclaimer. ©2020 Dennis J. Wall. All rights reserved.

Posted by on June 24, 2020 at 04:58 AM in Stipulated Protective Orders |

Tags: #"Confidential", #ConfidentialDesignation, #JuanOrtiz, #N.D.Cal., #SanFrancisco, #StipulatedProtectiveOrders

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.